Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. Colorado Rapids created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. Philadelphia Union created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Inter Miami created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. New England had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. Nashville SC created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Even on chances, even on the score.
Report →Analysis. Chicago Fire earned the win on chance quality — CF Montréal’s volume didn’t turn into the better chances.
Report →Analysis. Portland Timbers had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Atlanta United created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. CF Montréal had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →