Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Report after full time.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. São Paulo created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Internacional had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Palmeiras had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Even on chances, even on the score.
Report →Analysis. Vasco da Gama had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Even on chances, even on the score.
Report →Analysis. The chances were close.
Report →Analysis. Flamengo earned the win on chance quality — Atlético Mineiro’s volume didn’t turn into the better chances.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro edged the chances.
Report →Analysis. Santos created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Atlético Mineiro created the better chances and converted them.
Report →Analysis. Chapecoense had the better chances. The score did not follow.
Report →