

Sources complete · 3 of 3 models
Once you price in who's missing and the venue, FC Dallas look the stronger side on the season so far.
Availability-adjusted projected xG 1.19-1.40: FC Dallas the better side once absences are priced in.
What the models saw→
Goals against expected, both sides
Each provider runs its own shot model over the same shots. They weight chance quality differently, so they disagree. Gaps under 0.3 xG are noise.
Models that reported put LA Galaxy in a 0.99 xG band. A wide spread. The models are reading the chances differently.
3 of 3 models complete. Values sit side by side. They are not averaged. How we handle this
Who had the match→
Pressure Index by minute · not PPDA · LA 47' · DAL 48' of 96
Peak Pressure Index at 83'. LA 47' · DAL 48' of 96
Who made the match→
14 players · measured against their own per-90 baselines
4 saves
1 shot, 1 on target
2 shots, 2 on target, 3 key passes
Component ratings out of ten. An average night is 6.5. Above is better than that player's own baseline, below is worse. Ratings need 300 minutes of history.
What it changes
Got a take on that one?
I check it against the numbers and show the working.
Coming soon
The take tester is being rebuilt.